Latest News Up-to-date, objective coverage of events in the marketing, media and advertising research business worldwide, with particular emphasis on the UK and Continental Europe.

Most advertisers ignore official survey

20/June/2001

We all know that research response rates have declined, but this is ridiculous. Only 50 out of 1,000 senior marketing executives, members of the Incorporated Society of British Advertisers (ISBA) who received an ISBA-sponsored questionnaire from the Institute of Practitioners in Advertising (IPA), bothered to reply.

The 5% response rate is all the more shameful when it is considered that this was not any old survey but the latest wave in a serious and important biennial tracking study of attitudes to advertising effectiveness carried out by the IPA since 1994.

The response rate has gone down at an accelerating rate ever since 1994, when 131 people filled in the questionnaire. In 1996 the number fell to 115, in 1998 to 84 and at the end of last year to the said 50. Presumably in 2002 nobody will respond at all.

And yet the questionnaire was sent out with a covering note from the ISBA's Director General and contained such interesting questions as (for the first time) Does the Marketing Director of your organisation have a seat on the Board?

Stoutly ignoring the smallness of the response, Hamish Pringle, Director General Designate of the IPA, has gone on record as being "delighted that 64% of our ISBA respondents answered yes to this question, and this confirms the seniority of our sample.

"Last year, in association with CIA MediaLab, the IPA commissioned a survey of finance directors and found that only one-fifth of top UK companies had a marketing director on their main boards. As a result of that survey, the marketing community got together to urge chief executives of major PLCs to recognise the vital importance of the marketing function."

One problem may well have been the number of questions asked. There were 27, including classification questions about company size and advertising expenditure. Several of them were clearly calculated to focus attention on the IPA's Advertising Effectiveness Awards.

Surprisingly 14% of the sample, i.e. seven people, had never heard of the awards. This despite the fact that 76% of them, i.e. 38 people, worked for companies spending between 5 million and 100 million pounds annually on advertising.

Mind you, only 86% of the sample said they were personally responsible for adspend, leaving 14% who were not - possibly the same seven people who had never heard of the awards.

ISBA Director General Malcolm Earnshaw has declared: "The results of this study emphasise that the industry has done much good work over the past few years to underline the fundamental role that advertising has to play in successful business practice...

"Whilst a lot has been achieved already, the study suggests that there remains work to do to develop the tools which can help achieve this."

It also suggests, though Earnshaw did not say so, that ISBA has a lot of work to do to persuade its members to take part in useful research.

The IPA's Research Director, Lynne Robinson, may also wish to consider how surveys directed at marketing managers can be trimmed in such a way as not to frighten them away.

Though the size of the sample robs the survey of much of its significance, some of the tables in the IPA's report are interesting.

 

9 How important are each of the following communications disciplines to your marketing communications these days?

 

Sample

Consumer Advertising

Public Relations

Sales Promotion

Direct Marketing

Trade Advertising

Sponsor-ship

 

1994

(131)

Very Important

%

76

36

31

27

17

11

Quite Important

%

9

38

36

23

23

19

Mean

4.52

4.04

3.80

3.31

3.07

2.77

 

1996

(115)

Very Important

%

87

52

47

50

18

14

Quite Important

%

9

42

32

23

35

37

Mean

4.75

4.44

4.14

4.04

3.40

3.21

 

1998

(84)

Very Important

%

80

56

27

43

17

14

Quite Important

%

15

35

54

27

37

39

Mean

4.75

4.42

3.96

3.92

3.24

3.28

 

2000

Very Important

%

92

56

32

44

12

12

Quite Important

%

4

32

46

30

30

42

Mean

4.88

4.45

3.92

4.00

3.00

3.37

 

 

10 And to what degree do you feel satisfied in your ability to measure effectiveness in these same communications disciplines?

 

Sample

Consumer Advertising

Public Relations

Sales Promotion

Direct Marketing

Trade Advertising

Sponsor-ship

 

1994

(131)

Very Satisfied

%

14

5

14

34

3

1

Quite Satisfied %

53

23

44

31

25

17

Mean

3.60

2.83

3.50

3.89

2.68

2.43

 

1996

(115)

Very Satisfied

%

11

4

11

19

-

2

Quite Satisfied

%

45

25

47

44

20

8

Mean

3.49

2.84

3.39

3.73

2.77

2.37

 

1998

(84)

Very Satisfied

%

8

5

5

19

2

1

Quite Satisfied

%

54

29

43

50

19

13

Mean

3.50

2.77

3.22

3.80

2.57

2.55

 

2000

Very Satisfied

%

16

6

86

28

-

2

Quite Satisfied

%

42

22

6

46

18

16

Mean

3.48

2.78

2

3.92

2.64

2.56

 

 

12 Which of the following methods and techniques of measuring advertising effectiveness does your organisation make use of?

 

1996

1998

2000

Sample

     

All respondents

(115)

(84)

(50)

Answering Yes

%

%

%

Awareness

88

88

88

Brand Image

79

81

74

Sales Volume

78

87

82

Market Share

74

81

74

Profitability

49

51

50

Media/PR Coverage

42

54

54

Customer Satisfaction

41

46

46

Adherence to Budget

41

48

50

Competitive Brand Performance

n/a

45

44

Cost per lead

35

39

32

Brand Equity

n/a

38

26

Econometrics

n/a

33

30

Customer Retention & Loyalty

n/a

32

-

Return on Investment

10

33

36

Employee Motivation

n/a

21

12

Integrated Communications success

n/a

18

-

Shareholder Value

9

17

14

Brand Valuation

4

14

26

Share Price

4

10

4

 

 

13 Does the marketing director or your organisation have a seat on the Board?

Question not asked in previous years

   

1998

2000

Sample

 

(84)

(50)

All respondents

 

%

%

Yes

 

56

64

No

 

42

34

 

14 If your answer to Q13 is no, who in your organisation has responsibility for reporting on marketing and advertising on the Board?

Question not asked in previous years

   

1998

2000

Sample

     

All respondents

 

%

%

CEO/MD

 

49

41

Finance Director

 

3

6

HR Director

 

3

-

Operations Director

 

-

6

Commercial Director

 

20

24

IT Director

 

23

18

 

 

15 Within your organisation, which of the following does the marketing department have responsibility for?

Question not asked in previous years

   

1998

2000

Sample

     

All respondents

 

(84)

(50)

Answering Yes

 

%

%

Marketing Communications

 

95

94

Advertising

 

94

96

Marketing Strategy Development

 

94

96

Consumer Research

 

86

84

Design

 

85

86

Database Marketing

 

79

82

Public Relations

 

73

74

New Product Development

 

73

68

Loyalty

 

71

70

Customer Satisfaction Research

 

60

54

Business Intelligence

 

46

25

Internal Communications

 

36

28

Corporate Communications

 

27

28

Employee Research

 

25

10

Customer Service

 

23

28

 

 

19 In the last 2 years, to what degree have you seen an increase in…?

Question not asked in previous years

Sample

1998

(84)

2000

(50)

All respondents

Increase

%

No Change

%

Decrease

%

Don’t Know

%

Increase

%

No Change

%

Decrease

%

Don’t Know

%

Marketing Expenditure

63

21

13

2

74

14

12

-

Advertising Expenditure

63

18

15

4

62

26

12

-

Research Expenditure

62

21

12

5

46

40

14

-

 

 

© Copyright Market Research News
Latest News Background Home
Market Research News